BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:-//Economics Research - ECPv6.0.5//NONSGML v1.0//EN
CALSCALE:GREGORIAN
METHOD:PUBLISH
X-ORIGINAL-URL:https://research.reading.ac.uk/economics
X-WR-CALDESC:Events for Economics Research
REFRESH-INTERVAL;VALUE=DURATION:PT1H
X-Robots-Tag:noindex
X-PUBLISHED-TTL:PT1H
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/London
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0000
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:BST
DTSTART:20210328T010000
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0000
TZNAME:GMT
DTSTART:20211031T010000
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20210201T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20210201T140000
DTSTAMP:20260531T154503
CREATED:20210123T035553Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210519T132857Z
UID:2192-1612184400-1612188000@research.reading.ac.uk
SUMMARY:James Reade (Internal Seminar)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Disparate Sporting Topics: Expert Forecasts and No Shows \nAbstract: This talk combines two separate pieces of research that are not obviously linked other than that they look at sport. The first considers a novel dataset of German expert forecasts of football match scorelines. Forecasts from 25 experts (21 male\, 4 female\, including famous former footballers and at least one rapper) are collected for over 400 matches over a year and a half\, and analysed in terms of their success\, but also tentatively the information that each uses. The second topic is the phenomenon of no shows – fans that buy tickets for an event but then do not attend. This is distinct behaviour from that of fans that actually attend. We don’t observe individual level data\, but we do have data from Reading FC since 2004 on the number of no shows at each matches\, alongside various other characteristics (total tickets sold\, total in attendance\, home and away spectators). \nWatch the recording
URL:https://research.reading.ac.uk/economics/event/james-reade-internal-seminar-2/
CATEGORIES:Internal Seminars
END:VEVENT
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/London:20210208T130000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/London:20210208T140000
DTSTAMP:20260531T154503
CREATED:20210123T035631Z
LAST-MODIFIED:20210519T132356Z
UID:2193-1612789200-1612792800@research.reading.ac.uk
SUMMARY:Steven Bosworth (Internal Seminar)
DESCRIPTION:Title: Parental time investments and instantaneous well-being in the United States (with Almudena Sevilla and Ignacio Gimenez-Nadal) \nAbstract: We use the Well-being Modules of the American Time Use Survey to document that\, despite spending about 30 minutes more in child care per day\, higher educated mothers report lower levels of instantaneous well-being than less-educated mothers during child-related activities. Our results hold after controlling for a wide set of cofounders\, including life satisfaction. We present an identity economics model of “intensive mothering” to explain these findings: mothers with high education relative to a reference group select into an identity which places high value on human capital outcomes. This identity confers high social prestige but requires costly investments to maintain a separating equilibrium. Consistent with the model\, we find that the education gradient in maternal instantaneous well-being is unique to child care activities. There is no education gradient during non-child-related activities\, among fathers or among non-mothers. \nWatch the recording
URL:https://research.reading.ac.uk/economics/event/steven-bosworth-internal-seminar-2/
CATEGORIES:Internal Seminars
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR