{"id":23,"date":"2018-05-25T09:16:14","date_gmt":"2018-05-25T08:16:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/research.reading.ac.uk\/mediation-medical-disputes\/?page_id=23"},"modified":"2023-12-06T12:49:00","modified_gmt":"2023-12-06T12:49:00","slug":"our-research","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/research.reading.ac.uk\/mediation-medical-disputes\/our-research\/","title":{"rendered":"Our Research"},"content":{"rendered":"

What is the research about?<\/h3>\n

Mediation, which is a form of alternative dispute resolution, is generally more informal and flexible than court proceedings, but often takes place alongside or in parallel with court cases. When discussing ‘medical treatment disputes’ this means disagreements that arise between patients, health professionals, family members and others regarding the provision of health and care to the patient herself. Usually the patient will be an adult with impaired mental capacity or be a child below the age of 16, such that they are legally incapable of making their own decision about medical treatment, hence the involvement of healthcare professionals, family members and the courts.<\/p>\n

By carrying out this research now we expect to benefit potential users of mediation to resolve such disputes by identifying ways in which mediation can be used in therapeutic ways while acknowledging the potential risks of mediation in this area. For example, we hypothesise that certain approaches to mediation (including, style and process), times at which to mediate and the participation of lay participants may all impact the extent to which therapeutic justice can be achieved. We will also consider whether there is anything specific to the healthcare environment that makes it particularly amenable to, or challenging for, the therapeutic benefits of mediation.<\/p>\n

Research questions<\/h3>\n