I attended the Workshop on Sensitivity Analysis and Data Assimilation in Meteorology and Oceanography, also known as Adjoint Workshop, which took place in Aveiro, Portugal between 1st and 6th July 2018. This opportunity was given to me due to funding for early career researchers from the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) Data Assimilation for the Resilient City (DARE) project in the UK. All recipients of this fund that were participating for the first time in the workshop were invited to attend the pre-workshop day of tutorials, presenting sensitivity analysis and data assimilation fundamentals geared to the early career researchers. I would like to thank to EPSRC DARE award committee and the organizers of the Adjoint Workshop for finding me worthy of this award.
Currently I’m a post graduate student at the Brazilian National Institute for Space Research (INPE) and have been visiting the Global Modeling and Assimilation Office (GMAO) of the American National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) for almost one year as part of my PhD comparing two approaches to obtain what is known as the observation impact measure. This measure is obtained as a direct application of sensitivity in data assimilation and basically is a measure of how much each observation helps to improve the short-range forecasts. In Meteorology, specifically in numerical weather prediction, these observations are represented by the global observing system, which includes observations obtained from a number of in situ (e.g., radiosondes, and surface observations) and remote sensed observations (e.g., satellite sensors). During my visit, I’ve been working under the supervision of Ricardo Todling from NASA/GMAO comparing results from two strategies for assessing the impact of observations on forecasts using data assimilation system available at NASA/GMAO: one based on the traditional adjoint technique, another based on ensembles. Preliminary results from this comparison were presented during the Adjoint Workshop.
The Adjoint Workshop provided a perfect environment for early career researchers interact with experts in the field from all around the world. The attendance at the workshop has helped me engage healthy discussions about my work and data assimilation in general. The full programme with abstracts and presentations is available at the workshop web site: https://www.morgan.edu/adjoint_workshop
Thanks to everyone who contributed to this workshop.
Supported by the DARE project, I and a few others from the University of Reading recently attended the weeklong workshop on sensitivity analysis and data assimilation in meteorology and oceanography (a.k.a. the Adjoint workshop) in Aveiro, Portugal.
The week consisted of 60 talks on a variety of selected topic areas including sensitivity analysis and general theoretical data assimilation. I presented the latest results from my PhD research in this topic area and discussed the benefits of using globally convergent methods in variational data assimilation (VarDA) problems. Variational data assimilation combines two sources of information, a mathematical model and real data (e.g. satellite observations).
The overall aim of my research is to investigate the latest mathematical advances in optimisation to understand whether the solution of VarDA problems could be improved or obtained more efficiently through the use of alternative optimisation methods, whilst keeping computational cost and calculation time to a minimum. A possible application of the alternative methods would be to estimate the initial conditions for a weather forecast where the dynamical equations in this case include the physics of the earth system. Weather forecasting has a short time window (the forecast will no longer be useful after the weather event occurs) and so it is important to investigate alternative methods that provide an optimal solution in the given time.
The VarDA problem is known in numerical optimisation as a nonlinear least-squares problem which is solved using an iterative method – a method which takes an initial guess of the solution and then generates a sequence of better guesses at each step of the algorithm. The problem is solved in VarDA as a series of linear least-squares (simpler) problems using a method equivalent to the Gauss-Newton optimisation method. The Gauss-Newton method is not globally convergent in the sense that the method does not guarantee convergence to a stationary point given any initial guess. This is the motivation behind the investigation of newly developed, advanced numerical optimisation methods such as globally convergent methods which use safeguards to guarantee convergence from an arbitrary starting point. The use of such methods could enable us to obtain an improvement on the estimate of the initial conditions of a weather forecast within the limited time and computational cost available.
The conference brought together many key figures in weather forecasting as well as those new to the field such as myself, providing us with the opportunity to learn from each other during the talks and poster session. I had the advantage of presenting my talk on the first day, allowing me to spend the rest of the week receiving feedback from the attendees who were eager to discuss ideas and make suggestions for future work. The friendly atmosphere of the workshop made it easier as an early-career researcher to freely and comfortably converse with those more senior during the breaks.
I would like to thank the DARE project for funding my attendance at the workshop and the organising committee for hosting such an insightful event.
This summer I was fortunate enough to receive funding from the DARE training fund to attend the 11th workshop on sensitivity analysis and data assimilation in meteorology and oceanography. This workshop, also known as the adjoint workshop, provides academics and students with an occasion to present their research of the inclusion of Earth observations into mathematical models. Due to the friendly environment of the workshop, I was presented with an excellent opportunity to condense a portion of my research into a poster and discuss it with other attendees at the workshop.
Data assimilation is essentially a way to link theoretical models of the world to the actual world. This is achieved by finding the most likely state of a model through observations of it. A state for numerical weather prediction will typically be comprised of variables such as wind, moisture and temperature at a specific time. One way to assimilate observations is through the Kalman Filter. The Kalman Filter assimilates one observation at a time and through consideration of the errors of our models, computations and observations we can determine the most probable state of our model and use this state to better model or forecast the real world.
It goes without saying that a better understanding of the errors involved in the observations would lead to a better forecast. Therefore, research into observation errors is a large and ongoing area of interest. My research is on observation error due to unresolved scales in data assimilation which can be broadly described as the difference between what an observation actually observes and a numerical model’s representation of that observation. For example, an observation taken in a sheltered street of a city will have a different value than a numerical model of that city unable to individually represent the spatial scales of each street. To utilize such observations within data assimilation, the unresolved spatial scales must be accounted for in some way. The method I chose to create a poster for was the Schmidt-Kalman Filter which was originally developed for navigation purposes but has since been the subject of a few studies within the meteorology community on unresolved scales error.
The Schmidt-Kalman Filter accounts for the state- and time-dependence of the error due to unresolved scales through use of the statistics of the unresolved scales. However, to save on computational expense, the unresolved state values will be disregarded. My poster presented a mathematical analysis of a simple example for the Schmidt-Kalman Filter and highlighted its ability to compensate for unresolved scales error. The Schmidt-Kalman filter performs better than a Kalman Filter for just the resolved scales but worse than a Kalman Filter that resolves all scales which is to be expected. Using the feedback from the other attendees and ideas obtained from other presentations at the workshop I will continue to investigate the properties of the Schmidt-Kalman Filter as well as its suitability for urban weather prediction.
Luca Cantarello is an PhD student at the University of Leeds. He received funding from the DARE training fund to attend Data Assimilation tutorials at the Workshop on Sensitivity Analysis and Data Assimilation in Meteorology and Oceanography, 1-6 July 2018, Aveiro, Portugal. Here he writes about his experience.
Since I started my PhD project at the University of Leeds as a NERC DTP student a few months ago, I have been reflecting on the importance of not feeling too alone in doing science, exactly like in the everyday life. The risk of feeling isolated while doing research can very much apply to all PhD students, but it may be particularly relevant to cases like mine, as very few people are dealing with Data Assimilation in my university.
In this sense, joining the last week’s 11th Adjoint workshop on sensitivity analysis and Data Assimilation in Meteorology and Oceanography in Aveiro has been an excellent opportunity and I am very grateful to the University of Reading and the DARE project for having helped me to take part in it, I received funding from the DARE project which enabled me to attend.
In Aveiro I could enjoy the company and the support of a vast community of scientists, all willing to share their findings and discuss problems and needs with their peers. In the room there was an impressive synergy among many researchers who had attended the same workshop several times in the past, despite it has been held only every second or third year.
The photograph is of the hotel where the adjoint workshop was held.
The workshop has been an important training opportunity for me as I am still in the process of learning, but also an occasion to revive my motivation with new stimuli and ideas before getting to the heart of my PhD in the coming two years.
During the poster session I took part in, I got useful feedback and comments about my project (supervised by Onno Bokhove and Steve Tobias at the University of Leeds and by Gordon Inverarity at the Met Office), in which I am trying to understand how satellite observations at different spatial scales impact on a Data Assimilation scheme. I will bring back to Leeds all the hints and the suggestions I have collected, hoping to attend the next adjoint meeting in a few years and being able to tell people the progress I have achieved in the meantime.
Jemima M. Tabeart is an PhD student at the University of Reading in the Mathematics of Planet Earth Centre for Doctoral Training, shehas received funding from the DARE training fund to attend Data Assimilation tutorials at the Workshop on Sensitivity Analysis and Data Assimilation in Meteorology and Oceanography, 1-6 July 2018, Aveiro, Portugal. Here she writes about her research work.
In order to produce the best weather forecast possible, we want to make use of all available sources of information. This means combining observations of the world around us at the current time with a computer model that can fill in the gaps where we have no observations, by using known laws of physics to evolve observations from the past. This combination process is called data assimilation, and our two data sources (the model and observations) are weighted by our confidence in how accurate they are. This means that knowledge about errors in our observations is really important for getting good weather forecasts. This is especially true where we expect errors between different observations to be related, or correlated.
Caption: An image of the satellite MetOp-B which hosts IASI (Infrared Atmospheric Sounding Interferometer) – an instrument that I have been using as an example to test new mathematical techniques to allow correlated errors to be used inexpensively in the Met Office system. Credit: ESA AOES Medialab MetOp-B image.
Why do such errors occur? No observation will be perfect: there might be biases (e.g. a thermometer that measures everything 0.5℃ too hot), we might not be measuring variables that are used in a numerical model, and converting observations introduces an error (this is the case with satellite observations), and we might be using high density observations that can detect phenomena that our model cannot (e.g. intense localised rainstorms might not show up if our model can only represent objects larger than 5km). Including additional observation error correlations means we can use observation data more intelligently and even extract extra information, leading to improvements in forecasts.
However, these observation error correlations cannot be calculated directly – we instead have to estimate them. Including these estimates in our computations is very expensive, so we need to find ways of including this useful error information in a way that is cheap enough to produce new forecasts every 6 hours! I research mathematical techniques to adapt error information estimates for use in real-world systems.
Caption: Error correlation information for IASI instrument. Dark colours indicate stronger relationships between errors for different channels of the instrument – often strong relationships occur between variables that measure similar things. We want to keep this structure, but change the values in a way that makes sure our computer system still runs quickly.
At the workshop I’ll be presenting new work that tests some of these methods using the Met Office system. Although we can improve the time required for our computations, using different error correlation information alters other parts of the system too! As we don’t know “true” values, it’s hard to know whether these changes are good, bad or just different. I’m looking forward to talking with scientists from other organisations who understand this data and can provide insight into what these differences mean. Additionally, as these methods are already being used to produce forecasts at meteorological centres internationally, discussions about the decision process and impact of different methods are bound to be illuminating!
Takuya Kurihana has received funding from the DARE training fund to attend Data Assimilation tutorials at the Workshop on Sensitivity Analysis and Data Assimilation in Meteorology and Oceanography, 1-6 July 2018, Aveiro, Portugal. Here he writes about himself and his research.
What if we could more accurately predict what atmospheric phenomenon will happen in the next minute, hour and day using the current limited information. This scientific question has inspired me to be being involved in the research activity since undergraduate student. I am Takuya Kurihana, a Meteorology MS student in the University of Tsukuba under the supervision of Dr. Hiroshi L. Tanaka, and an incoming Computer Science PhD student in the University of Chicago. My current research focuses on 1. How to improve the accuracy of weather forecasting: “Predictability”, and 2. How to make use of a massive amount of dense meteorological dataset for data assimilation. With developing new application for purpose 2, I am now researching the impact of using a large amount of atmospheric observation as much as we can towards the daily scale weather forecast.
Regarding to the improvement predictability, as a previous article explained by Zak Bell, Making the Most of Uncertain Urban Observations , data assimilation plays an imperative role in numerical weather prediction because the longer we run a numerical weather forecasting model, the larger the error of forecast grows up. This is because the uncertainty. Even if we use the most precise model, this tendency would not change more or less. But, applying the data assimilation methods can minimize the error by installing observation into the optimization process Fig.1 is an example experiment about an advantage of data assimilation. Therefore, we have to gather a variety of denser observation data from both horizontally and vertically wider range of points in real operation. Other than land observation (Figure 2) , sondes, and buoys, recent satellite observation (Figure 3 and Figure 4) [2, 3], which provide us much richer and denser information, have been utilized in operational data assimilation processes.
The spatially condensed satellite data, however, causes one problem in the current data assimilation methods. The issue is that too much dense data will rather deteriorate the quality of assimilation products based on previous researches. Simply put, we have to leave out large proportion of these data: “Thinning”, even while the technology of meteorological satellites is advancing. Moreover, there are several resource limitations to prepare the forecasting since we are not afford to compute endlessly, and the performance and size of computer are constrained. In order to make use of larger proportion of these data while not reducing assimilation quality, the spatial interpolation, so called super-observation (SO) procedure are developed. As one SO system, I proposed a new algorithm which could deal with a massive amount of satellite big data efficiently and speedily within a cloud-resolving model (Nonhydrostatic ICosahedral Atmospheric Model; NICAM) grid coordination. The algorithm primary targets to reduce “Do/For Loop” iteration process to find the nearest model grid location, which can also skip the computation by a complex observation operator.
Which is better Thinning or SO? Although this would be controversial discussion among meteorologists, I would like to give one example in the Workshop on Sensitivity Analysis and Data Assimilation in Portugal. While the new application should be tested in further numerical experiments through my master research project, I ponder that we should consider a more efficient usage of these meteorological “Big Data” in the near future. Through the attendance at the workshop, I would like to discuss my application and its effect on the data assimilation, as well as receive fruitful advice from cutting edge researchers.
Figure 1. These timeseries of trajectories imply a small difference between two initial conditions finally ends up completely varied behaviors. Blue is No data assimilation from 200 time steps, and Red is data assimilation Lorenz63 Trajectory. Demo above by Takuya Kurihana.
Figure. 2 This map shows the sparse location of land observation points
 S-A. Boukabara, K. Garrett, K. V. Kumar, “Potential Gaps in the Satellite Observing System Coverage: Assessment of Impact on NOAA’s Numerical Weather Prediction Overall Skills”. (2016). Mon. Wea. Rev., 144, 2547–2563, https://doi.org/10.1175/ MWR-D-16-0013.1.